tag, on your page, and then edit the starting date you would like to use under the today=new date line. you must use numbers for month, day, and year. These instruction lines are invisible, and will not be seen on your page.
-
This script came from the Dummy Proof JavaScripts Site at: http://www.dummyproof.com/javascripts
Please visit the site for more easy to use JavaScripts to enhance your web pages.
*/
today = new Date();
bYear = 2007; // Start year
bMonth = 05; // Start month
bDay = 27; // Start day
tYear = today.getYear();
tMonth = (today.getMonth() ) + 1 ;
tDay = today.getDate();
tHour = today.getHours();
fYear = 0;
fMonth = 0;
fDay = 0;
fHour = 0;
x = 0;
y = 0;
z = 0;
a = 0;
b = 0;
c = 0;
function testMonth() {
if (y==4 || y==6 || y==9 || y==11) x=30
else if (y==2) x=28
else x=31
}
function testDay() {
fDay = (z - bDay) + tDay;
if (fDay > a) {
fMonth += 1;
fDay = fDay - a;
}
}
y = bMonth;
testMonth();
z = x;
y = bMonth;
testMonth();
a = x;
if (bMonth <= tMonth) {
fYear = tYear - bYear;
fMonth = (tMonth - bMonth);
testDay();
}
fYear = (tYear - bYear) - 1
fMonth = ((12 - bMonth) + tMonth) - 1;
testDay();
if (fMonth >= 12) {
fYear += 1;
fMonth -= 12;
}
// the following splits apart the dates recursively and replaces them with equiv graphics and displays.
with(Math) {
theYear=fYear;
tensYear=floor(theYear/10);
onesYear=theYear-(tensYear*10);
theMonth=fMonth
tensMonth=floor(theMonth/10);
onesMonth=theMonth-(tensMonth*10);
theDay=fDay
tensDay=floor(theDay/10);
onesDay=theDay-(tensDay*10);
var testArray = new makeArray("January", "February", "March", "April", "May", "June", "July", "August", "Sep.", "Oct.", "November", "December");
for (z=1; z<=12; z++) {
if (tMonth==z) {
var b=testArray[z]
}
}
for (z=1; z<=12; z++) {
if (bMonth==z) {
var c=testArray[z]
}
}
}
var page
page = " Today´s date: " + b + " "+tDay+", " + tYear+".
"
page += "Our Site has been up since "+ c + " " + bDay + ", "+bYear+"
"
function makeArray() {
this.length = makeArray.arguments.length
for (var i = 0; i < this.length; i++)
this[i+1] = makeArray.arguments[i]
}
// -- End Hiding Here -->
C.A.L.M.
Community Advocates for Little Mountain
Will you stand with us?
We stand for housing
|
|
Will the new Little Mountain
housing development address the urgent
affordable housing needs of Vancouver?
In the midst of a province-wide housing crisis, the British Columbia government has demolished all but a handful of the 224 units of the Little Mountain Housing complex.
The demolition began in November 2009. One building still stands on the otherwise flattened 15 acres, housing a handful of residents who have refused to move.
The City of Vancouver is holding consultation meetings about the site's future. Neighbours who live in the area, affordable housing advocates, current and former residents
of the complex and other interested people have been discussing the issue with city staff, the architects and the developer. Information about the consultation is on the city's website at:
http://vancouver.ca/commsvcs/planning/littlemountain/index.htm
The B.C. government's agreement with the developer is to replace the 224 demolished units. The Riley Park/South Cambie (RPSC) Visions Group has called for
any increase beyond the 1,000 total housing units already approved to include a proportional increase in social housing units. CALM is calling for a minimum of 750 rent-geared-to-income units
with subsidies at varying levels.
CALM urges you to make your opinion known on the urgent need for affordable
housing. Letters to the editor and calls to radio talk shows make a
difference:
letters@globeandmail.com
sunletters@png.canwest.com provletters@png.canwest.com
letters@straight.com
http://thetyee.ca/Blogs/TheHook/Housing/2009/11/06/Demolition-begins-at-Little-Mountain/ (you can comment on this article on
line)
CBC radio talkback number: 604-662-6690 CKNW radio
comment line: 604-331-2784 The Courier: comment online at
The Courier
|
|
News Release
CALM
Community Advocates for Little
Mountain
For immediate release November 6, 2009 / 7:45AM
Wrecking ball starts today to
destroy Little Mountain Housing Protesters block gates and send a message Protesters’ message to the provincial and city governments:
NEVER AGAIN!
The destruction of Little Mountain is
a disaster that must never be repeated! The needless and senseless
destruction of a well-functioning community and habitable homes, years
before construction can begin, is a major setback for affordable housing
in our city.
It is wrong to destroy a
vibrant supportive community. This will be a phased development; with
proper planning, tenants could have moved to one part of the site while
the other part was being re-developed.
It is wrong to needlessly
destroy affordable housing. Our city is in the midst of the worst housing
crisis in history. Affordable rentals keep disappearing at a phenomenal
rate and families with low and modest incomes are leaving the city in
droves. It is unconscionable to remove 224 affordable homes for a period
of several years. It is wrong to put the greed of developers before the
housing needs of our people.
It is wrong to sell public
land. Vancouver does not need hundreds of high priced condos
– what we do need is a community with 2 or 3
times as many social housing units and additional affordable housing for
working class and middle class families. While half of the proceeds
may be invested in supportive housing elsewhere (not affordable family
housing), permanent assets (land) are being replaced by temporary assets
(buildings). The only way to build affordable housing at affordable cost
is to build on public land. It is short-sighted and ill-conceived to fund
supportive housing out of the proceeds of selling public land. Now, there
will never be additional affordable housing on the site.
We need policies that ensure this will
not happen again. Several other social housing complexes in Vancouver are
slated for "re-development". These sites must remain in public hands and
be developed in a way that leaves the existing communities intact and
ensures that any re-development consists of affordable homes (geared to
income).
CONTACT:
Little Mountain Fact Sheet
The demolition of the 224 homes at
Little Mountain is going ahead.
The needless destruction of a
well-functioning community and habitable homes, years before construction
can begin, is a setback for affordable housing in our city and
represents a return to long-discredited "urban renewal" practices. By
choosing to redevelop Little Mountain in this way, our governments have
made a major mistake that must never be repeated.
Little Mountain is no "win" for the
tenants. The remaining tenants have all received eviction notices, in
spite of the impression given by our Mayor. They will be able to move into
one building just long enough to watch the demolition of their homes and
their community and will then have to vacate the site. In fact, the
only guarantee the tenants have from BC Housing is that they will have to
move again if they choose to stay on-site while the demolition
proceeds. This is all for the benefit of the developer (Holborn) who was a
major financial contributor to Vision Vancouver.
Contrary to the Mayor's statements,
affordable housing at Little Mountain is not being "maximized".
There will be no increase in the number of social housing units.
One-for-one replacement is not good enough given the need for affordable
housing and the dramatic density increase that will occur at this site.
The City of Vancouver usually requires that 20% of a major development be
reserved for additional affordable housing. At Little Mountain the City
will be contravening its own policies, as the number of social housing
units will comprise around 10% of the planned new development.
The Mayor has announced that
high-density re-zoning of the site will proceed despite the
Council-approved Community Vision for a four-storey limit (already
more than quadruple the existing density). This is a betrayal of the
commitment to the community by City Council, the Province and the
developer for an "extensive" public planning process to examine all policy
options prior to considering a rezoning proposal.
Community consultation has yet to
happen. Construction will not start until well after the Olympics. The
site will be developed in phases and presumably the 224 social housing
units will be replaced in phase one. That will take a minimum of two
years. In the meantime, the rest of the site will sit empty. During
this period, Little Mountain could have housed many families.
Instead, it is being obliterated for
the convenience of a private developer who has stated that it is "easier"
for his purposes to destroy all of the homes now, rather than have the
homes occupied until he is ready to build. The great shame of the Little
Mountain fiasco is that it is so ill-conceived and unnecessary. The
entire process at Little Mountain has been about destruction: of
existing affordable housing; of future affordable housing; of
community; of people’s lives. |
|
For immediate
release | July 3, 2009 |
Demolition company refuses work
at Little Mountain housing complex Project Manager to
attend July 4 rally to protest the demolition
Vancouver --
Clearwater Environmental Group is a demolition company that refuses to bid on
the demolition of the 224 social housing units at Little Mountain. "What the
government is doing here is not right. They should not be taking down homes
before they have a plan to build anything", says Mike Cote, Project Manager
for the company.
Cote attended a government sponsored information
meeting for prospective demolition companies on Tuesday, June 30 and left as
soon as he understood the situation. "We thought these homes were coming down
and would be replaced immediately. We are in the business of making people's
lives better, not ruining them," he said. Clearwater Environmental Group was
one of several demolition companies attending the meeting. The provincial
government required the attendance of any company wanting to bid on the
demolition of the 15 acre site.
"Everyone knows there is not enough
affordable housing. How could you sleep at night after tearing down these
homes for an Olympic parking lot? We want no part of this until there is a
plan," Cote continued.
-30-
|
BC HOUSING STRIPS LM FURNISHINGS WITHOUT DEMOLITION PERMIT
THEY CAME IN WITH CHAIN SAWS AND REMOVED FURNISHINGS FOR RESALE FROM UNITS next to two occupants at Little Mountain Housing
YOU WILL NOTICE THAT THIS AREA WAS NOT EVEN FENCED
We are selling the Premier’s house. Yes, you heard that right.
How to get in on the most amazing real estate event in BC history See Details...
|

|
Saturday April 4, 2009 Marches and rallies by 108 organizations in 17 BC communities
See list...
|
Vancouver Art-Ins Colorful, eloquent pleas for Housing as a Human Right Read more...
|
News media flock to Little Mountain Art-In
and its controversial aftermath
On December 7th
fifty artists, residents and former residents
painted pictures in support of CALM’s call to reopen and re-tenant the 200 vacant homes at the Little Mountain Housing complex to help ease Vancouver’s housing emergency.
CALM proposes that the homes be occupied until construction is ready to start. Without that agreement, it could take 3 – 10 years before the site provides new housing.
The artists created a wide variety of pieces—children’s and child-like art,
realistic family portraits, political cartoons and slogans, and surrealistic depictions of homelessness, poverty and eviction. Five Vancouver newspapers covered the event.
On December 11th
a work crew posted the art from the
Art-In.
On December 12th
BC Housing sent the company Goodbye
Graffiti to paint out art that it deemed offensive.
Top 12 Most Objectionable Statements about Affordable Housing
According to BC Housing
12. “Don’t destroy our house”
11. "Poor people need homes too"
10. "Embrace community diversity. Against marginalization"
9. "Shame on our city. Developers cause homelessness"
8. "Would you want to be kicked out of your HOME?"
7. "Society will change the day our politicians are homeless"
6. "House our brothers and sisters"
5. "Put people first, people before profit"
4. "Affordable housing now!"
3. "Can i have my home back now?"
2. "Home is where the heart is, don't break my heart"
And the number one most objectionable statement about affordable housing, according to BC
Housing:
1. "Love still lives here"
(Actually, BC Housing was least fond of a piece that used the imagery of the children’s
game “Hangman” and the slogan “The Death of Social Housing.” Indeed, the death of social housing is highly objectionable.)
On December 15th
CALM held an outdoor gallery opening of “500 metres of Art for Affordable Housing.” Seven media outlets, including radio, television and the press covered the opening and the BC Housing’s obliterations.
|
|
|
Help Bring Back a Federal Social Housing Program
Canada is the only major country in the world without
a national housing strategy, spending even less than half what the US spends on
housing programs per capita.
What We Want From Our Federal Government
- An end to homelessness and affordable housing crises.
A permanent national housing program that annually uses 1% of the federal
budget to build new social housing and would create 2000 units of new housing
in BC affordable to people on low and modest incomes.
Restoration of the national co-op housing programs of the 1970s and
1980s.
Employment insurance benefits, and senior and disability pensions rates
that allow people to live safely and with dignity.
|
What Municipalities Must Do About Affordable Housing
While the major responsibility for housing rests with the provincial and federal
governments, city councils control land use policies that can impact the stock
of rental housing and dampen speculation that inflates housing prices.
City governments can:
- Require affordable housing units in new developments as a condition of
re-zoning
Protect the housing of people living in trailer
parks
Prevent rental conversions to condos
Keep public land public
Call on senior governments to invest in and build affordable
housing
|
The 3 top priorities for
voters:
- Homelessness
- Poverty
- Affordable housing
--Ipsos Reid poll of
Vancouver voters, Sep. 2008
|
|
Action Links:
Community Advocates
Links:
|
Action Links:
Media
News News Source
Links: |
|
|
Monday Dec 14th, 2009
|
|
Wednesday Feb 11, 2009
|
|
Tuesday Feb 10, 2009
|
|
Monday Nov 17, 2008
|
|
Monday Oct. 30, 2008
|
|
Thursday Oct. 30, 2008
|
|
Thursday Oct. 23, 2008
|
|
Thursday Oct. 9, 2008
|
|
Monday Dec. 4, 2006
|
|
Thursday Sep. 21, 2006
|
|
Thursday Sep. 21, 2006
|
|
|
Help draw attention to the scandal!
- Needless dislocation of tenants from little mountain housing and the plan to destroy habitate social housing homes, years before construction begins.
- More then 200 empty units while others have nowhere to live. why? to convenience the potential developer
|
Let's Stand Up To Get
Agendas Now!
|
Healthy communities are more important than wealthy developers
|
|
|
|